inif

With inif, you can
have your resume checked.

Upload your resume and get edits down to the sentence.

Get startedSee the tools
  • Your everyday AI platform — the same account on the web and in the app
On par
This resume shows solid performance and a well-structured presentation, with room to improve.

There is enough substance here, but every line stops at what you were responsible for and never reaches what came of it. A recruiter scanning this finds the entries interchangeable, and closes it remembering none of them.

Format and readability

Eleven entries on one page
Each one is down to a single line, so the page reads as a list. Keep four or five and write them properly.
Dates are formatted two different ways
Some read "2024.03" and others "March 2024", so the reader spends attention lining up dates instead of reading.
The skills line has no tiers
Python sits beside Word on the same line, and a recruiter cannot tell which one you actually work in.

Sentence-level edits

Managed social media; grew followers and engagement.
Grew the department Instagram from 800 to 3,200 followers in three months, mostly through a weekly alumni interview series; engagement rose from 1.2% to 4.6%.
Numbers make it believable; the method shows what you can actually do. Without both, the line tells an interviewer nothing.
Assisted with department events.
Ran the 120-person department orientation, owning the schedule and venue coordination; cut check-in from the usual 40 minutes to 15.
"Assisted" is the least informative word on a resume. Give the scale, and name the part you decided yourself.

A full, clear report

Not a score and nothing else. Every answer comes back with an analysis and the specific change to make, alongside an overall result and the dimensions behind it — so you can see which part was thin, not just that something was.

  • On par
    This resume shows solid performance and a well-structured presentation, with room to improve.

    There is enough substance here, but every line stops at what you were responsible for and never reaches what came of it. A recruiter scanning this finds the entries interchangeable, and closes it remembering none of them.

  • Sentence-level edits

    Managed social media; grew followers and engagement.
    Grew the department Instagram from 800 to 3,200 followers in three months, mostly through a weekly alumni interview series; engagement rose from 1.2% to 4.6%.
    Numbers make it believable; the method shows what you can actually do. Without both, the line tells an interviewer nothing.
    Assisted with department events.
    Ran the 120-person department orientation, owning the schedule and venue coordination; cut check-in from the usual 40 minutes to 15.
    "Assisted" is the least informative word on a resume. Give the scale, and name the part you decided yourself.
  • Q
    Tell me about a project you got wrong, and what you did about it.
    A
    We found out right before launch that I had misread the spec, so I worked two extra days to fix it and it shipped fine.
  • Strengths
    A real mistake, not a fake one
    No "I am too much of a perfectionist" — already better than most answers.
    You recovered it
    The story has an ending and the outcome held.
    Areas to Improve
    Nothing changed structurally
    The answer stops at personal effort; nobody learns how you prevent a repeat.
    Nobody else appears
    A misread spec is usually a communication problem, and the answer contains only you.
  • Station 2Station 2 — judgement
  • Answer

    I would ask why first — it might be fear of pain, or the cost. Once I understand the reason I would explain what the treatment does and what happens without it, in words they follow. If they still refuse, I would bring in the attending physician and record the conversation.

  • Strengths
    Understands before persuading
    Puts "why the refusal" ahead of the explanation instead of rushing to overturn it.
    Knows when to escalate
    Recognises this is not an intern's call to make alone.
    Areas to Improve
    Never mentions autonomy
    The station turns on the right to refuse, and the answer never names it.
  • Vocal Delivery
    218Speaking Rate (words/min)
    7Filler words (3.2/min)
    “like” 4“you know” 2“sort of” 1

  • Format and readability

    Eleven entries on one page
    Each one is down to a single line, so the page reads as a list. Keep four or five and write them properly.
    Dates are formatted two different ways
    Some read "2024.03" and others "March 2024", so the reader spends attention lining up dates instead of reading.
    The skills line has no tiers
    Python sits beside Word on the same line, and a recruiter cannot tell which one you actually work in.
  • On par
    This mock interview performance is good and shows solid preparation, with room to improve.

    Steady on the technical questions, evasive as soon as it turns to collaboration and mistakes. Half of this posting is about working across teams, and you spent the whole session describing what you finished alone — not a gap in ability, a gap between what you talked about and who they are hiring.

  • Score
    6/ 10

    You covered what happened and how hard you worked, but not what you changed. The question is asking whether it can happen again; extra hours are not the answer.

  • On par
    The performance is good and handles situational challenges well, with room to improve.

    Across six stations, judgement and communication sit clearly above the other four. The shared weakness is that you never name the principle you are working from: your handling is usually right, but the mark sheet is looking for whether you know what it rests on.

  • ScenarioYou are the intern on duty in the emergency department.
    QuestionA patient refuses treatment you believe is necessary. How do you handle it?
  • Performance Score
    8/ 10
  • Thinking Framework
    Four principles
    AutonomyAsks why the treatment is being refused, but never says the decision is the patient’s to make.
    BeneficenceExplains what the treatment does and what happens without it. This part is complete.
    Non-maleficenceThe concrete risk of delay is never named; a panel would expect one sentence on it.
    JusticeNot in play at this station, and rightly skipped.
  • Feedback

    Asking before persuading is the right order — most candidates start by arguing. Add one line about respecting their final decision; that is what this station is actually testing.

Illustration only. The figures and content are fabricated; a real report comes from your own answers.

What inif does

Whatever you are preparing for, inif has it.

See all

How billing works

inif bills in coins — no subscription, pay for what you use. The cost is shown clearly before you start, and coins work everywhere across inif.

See full pricing

Start using inif

Get startedGet the iOS app